Development and sensory analysis of a vegan dessert from chickpea by-product
Abstract
Introduction: people are vegan for countless reasons: respect for animals, sustainability, and concern for health. Studies show that 14% of the country's population in 2018 were vegetarians and research points Brazil in the ranking of the ten countries with the largest increase in vegans. With this growth, alternative products have emerged, such as aquafaba, which is the water from cooking legumes. Objective: To develop a vegan dessert using meringue from aquafaba. Materials and Methods: The recipe was developed in the dietetic technique laboratory, in three samples with distinct flavors (A, B and C), and for sensory analysis to be performed the project was sent to the Ethics Committee (opinion 4.008.403 of 05/05/20), applying Term of Consent to random tasters (vegan, vegetarian and omnivore). Results: After compilation and statistical analysis, the mean sensory attributes, and their acceptability indices (AI) were calculated. Although there was no significant difference between the acceptance results of the samples, sample A was the best accepted (mean 92%), compared to B (mean 90.8%) and C (mean 89.6%). In the purchase intention there was an approval rate of 64% saying they would certainly buy, 28% would buy and 8% would maybe buy. Conclusion: the recipe developed had a good acceptance in all samples, considering the attributes evaluated as well as the positive correlation with the purchase intention of the tasters and their frequency of candy consumption. Thus, the preparation is contributing to a compilation of new products for the public in question.
References
-Allès, B.; Baudry, J.; Méjean, C.; Touvier, M.; Péneau, S.; Hercberg, S.; Kesse-Guyot, E. Comparison of Sociodemographic and Nutritional Characteristics between Self-Reported Vegetarians, Vegans, and Meat-Eaters from the NutriNet-Santé Study. Nutrients. Vol. 9. Num. 1023. 2017. p. 1-18.
-Amaral, F.M.; Southgate, A.N.N.; Batti, E.A.B. Desenvolvimento de sobremesas contemporâneas com base na diversidade brasileira. Revista Brasileira de Gastronomia. Vol. 1. Num. 1. 2018. p. 34-59.
-Bento, R.A.; Andrade, S.A.C.; Silva, A.M.A.D. Técnico em Alimentos. Análise sensorial de alimentos. Recife. e-Tec Brasil. 2013. p. 142.
-Brasil. Ministério da Saúde. Secretaria de Atenção à Saúde. Departamento de Atenção Básica. Guia alimentar para a população brasileira. Brasília. 2014. Disponível em:
https://bvsms.saude.gov.br/bvs/publicacoes/guia_alimentar_populacao_brasileira_2ed.pdf. Acesso em: 04/04/2021.
-Dever, Z. Aquafaba: Sweet and Savory Vegan Recipes Made Egg-Free with the Magic of Bean Water. Virginia. Vegan Heritage Press, LLC. 2016. p. 295.
-Dutcosky, S. Análise sensorial de alimentos. 4ª edição. Curitiba. 2013. p. 531.
-Gonçalves, N.A.; Cecchi, P.P.; Vieira, R.M.; Santos, M.D.A.; Almeida, T.C. Rotulagem de alimentos e consumidor. Nutrição Brasil. Vol. 14. Num. 4. 2015. p. 197-204.
-INSA. Instituto Nacional de Saúde Doutor Ricardo Jorge, SNS - Serviço Nacional de Saúde. Alimentação e Nutrição. Tabela de Composição de Alimentos (TCA). 2019. Disponível em: http://portfir.insa.pt/insa/about. Acesso dia: 01/04/2021.
-IBGE. Instituto Brasileiro de Geografia e Estatística. Pesquisa de Orçamentos Familiares 2008-2009. Tabela de Composição Nutricional dos Alimentos Consumidos no Brasil. Rio de Janeiro. 2011. Disponível em: https://biblioteca.ibge.gov.br/visualizacao/livros/liv50002.pdf. Acesso em: 04/04/2021.
-Jukanti, A.K.; Gaur, P.M.; Gowda, C.L.L.; Chibbar, R.N. Nutritional quality and health benefits of chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.): a review. British Journal of Nutrition. Vol. 108. Num. 1. 2012. p. 11-12.
-Kapp, C.S. Avaliação do mercado de alimentos processados veganos no Brasil - Uma análise comparativa a partir do mercado canadense. TCC. UFRGS. Porto Alegre. 2017.
-Meurer, M.C. Efeitos do ultrassom nas propriedades tecnológicas da água de cozimento do grão-de-bico (aquafaba). Dissertação de Mestrado. UFRGS. Porto Alegre. 2019.
-Mustafa, R.; Reaney, M.J.T. Aquafaba, from Food Waste to a Value-Added Product. IN Campos-Vega, R.; Oomah, B.D.; Vergara-Castañeda, H.A. Food Wastes and By‐products: Nutraceutical and Health Potential. 2020.
-Rachwa-Rosiak, D.; Nebesny, E.; Budryn, G. Chickpeas - composition, nutritional value, health benefits, application to bread and snacks: A review. Critical Reviews in Food Science and Nutrition. Vol. 55. Num. 8. 2015. p. 1137-1145.
-SVB. Sociedade Vegetariana Brasileira. Departamento de Medicina e Nutrição. Guia Alimentar de Dietas Vegetarianas: Para Adultos. São Paulo. 2012. Disponível em: https://www.svb.org.br/livros/guia-alimentar.pdf. Acesso em: 08/062021.
-SVB. Sociedade Vegetariana Brasileira. Mercado Vegano: Amplie Seu Público Consumidor. São Paulo. 2018. p. 7. a. Disponível em: https://svb.org.br/livros/mercado_vegano_2018.pdf. Acesso em: 11/05/2021.
-SVB. Sociedade Vegetariana Brasileira. Mercado Vegetariano: Estimativa de Porcentagem de Vegetarianos e Veganos no Brasil. São Paulo. 2018. b. Disponível em: https://www.svb.org.br/vegetarianismo1/mercado-vegetariano. Acesso em: 11/05/2021.
-SVB. Sociedade Vegetariana Brasileira. Mudança no padrão alimentar consolida nova fronteira mundial para o veganismo. São Paulo. 2019. Disponível em: https://www.svb.org.br/2524-mudanca-no-padrao-alimentar-consolida-nova-fronteira-mundial-para-o-veganismo. Acesso em: 08/06/2021.
-SVB. Sociedade Vegetariana Brasileira. Pesquisa do IBOPE aponta crescimento histórico no número de vegetarianos no Brasil. São Paulo. 2018. c. Disponível em: https://www.svb.org.br/2469-pesquisa-do-ibope-aponta-crescimento-historico-no-numero-de-vegetarianos-no-brasil#. Acesso em: 11/05/2021.
-Souza, M.J.P.; Oliveira, P.R.; Burnquist, H.L. Lar "Doce" Lar: uma análise do consumo de açúcar e de produtos relacionados no Brasil. Rev. Econ. Sociol. Rural. Vol. 51. Num. 4. 2013. p. 785-796.
-Torres-Moreno, M.; Tarrega, A.; Torrescasana, E.; Blanch, C. Influence of label information on dark chocolate acceptability. Appetite. Vol. 58. Num. 2. 2012. p. 665-671.
-Trigueiro, A. Consumo, Ética e Natureza: O Veganismo e as Interfaces de uma Política de Vida. Revista Internacional Interdisciplinar INTERthesis. Vol. 10. Num. 1. 2013. p. 237-238.
-USDA. United States Department of Agriculture. Sugar: World Markets and Trade. 2017. Disponível em: https://downloads.usda.library.cornell.edu/usda-esmis/files/z029p472x/dr26xx72f/76537174s/sugar-11-17-2017.pdf. Acesso em: 11/05/2021.
-Valvassori, S. Tendências da alimentação. Pesquisa FIESP. 2010. Disponível em: https://silo.tips/download/abaixo-estao-citados-dados-importantes-da-evoluao-e-crescimento-no-brasil. Acesso em: 11/052021.
-Wadhera, D.; Capaldi-Phillips, E.D. A Review of Visual Cues Associated with Food on Food Acceptance and Consumption. Eating Behaviors. Vol. 15. Num. 1. 2014. p. 132-143.
Copyright (c) 2022 Letícia Jesus de Oliveira, Sueli Essado Pereira

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish in this journal agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain the copyright and grant the journal the right of first publication, with work simultaneously licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution License BY-NC which allows the sharing of the work with acknowledgment of the authorship of the work and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are authorized to enter into additional contracts separately for non-exclusive distribution of the version of the work published in this journal (eg, publishing in institutional repository or book chapter), with acknowledgment of authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are allowed and encouraged to post and distribute their work online (eg, in institutional repositories or on their personal page) at any point before or during the editorial process, as this can bring about productive change as well as increase impact and impact. citation of published work (See The Effect of Free Access).